查看“Of Copyrights and Non-profits Part II”的源代码

In our last article, we reviewed the hypothetical case of Jane Doe, Executive Director of Money University, a 501( h )( 3) organization that teaches lower income people the concepts of money management. Jane is really a primary teacher, board member and president, to repeat. Linda can be an author who has created a number of books that Money U. would like to sell.Part II of our discussion will focus on another scenario. Within Money U.'s potential program plans, the board has expressed a desire for Jane to create curriculum to be properly used in its lessons. What're a number of the possibilities?It is vital that all events be planned regarding the arrangements. Without an agreement to the contrary, the [http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/supporters-of-uks-odwyer-seek-to-halt-extradition-177116.htm www.sbwire.com/press-releases/supporters-of-uks-odwyer-seek-to-halt-extradition-177116.htm] ownership defaults to Money U. Associated with that Money U. commissioned the work. This has a tendency to be the most typical situation.But what if Jane actually thinks that she deserves to retain the rights for the work she creates, even if it is commissioned? It is certainly a fair stand for Jane to get. She will spend much time in to its design. But given the most obvious conflict-of-interest, how should this be handled?Unlike last time, you'll find not really a large amount of options here. The best scenario would see Jane sign an agreement with the board which allows her to wthhold the copyright and give Money U. a permit to use the course in its lessons. The license may or may maybe not be unique. In any event, Jane shouldn't be taken care of developing the components, or should she be prepared to get any royalties from Money U. Essentially, Jane should not be writing on the clock, since she will be the supreme owner of the substance. It's very important to note, also, that Jane should have recused himself from table action regarding this agreement.Another problem we are usually asked is if the license agreement should be time-limited? There is no correct answer. Nearly talking, however, it only makes sense to place a day around the certificate. It can often be expanded. Still another warning we've sometimes seen put in this kind of license agreement is definitely an computerized cancellation in the event Jane is involuntarily terminated by Money U.Issues of intellectual property, copyrights and the conflict-of-interest that could arrive with it are extremely complex. Failure to understand that complexity and the need for strategic action over it could be very costly.