<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh">
		<id>https://www.8beauty.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Manor</id>
		<title>Manor - 版本历史</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.8beauty.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Manor"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.8beauty.com/wiki/index.php?title=Manor&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-02T11:47:41Z</updated>
		<subtitle>本wiki的该页面的版本历史</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.26.4</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.8beauty.com/wiki/index.php?title=Manor&amp;diff=18567&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Manor：新页面: Load is defined as the fee or the commission that an investor pays to a mutual fund at the time of acquiring or redeeming the shares of the mutual fund.  If the commission is charged when...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.8beauty.com/wiki/index.php?title=Manor&amp;diff=18567&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2013-01-05T23:28:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;新页面: Load is defined as the fee or the commission that an investor pays to a mutual fund at the time of acquiring or redeeming the shares of the mutual fund.  If the commission is charged when...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;新页面&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Load is defined as the fee or the commission that an investor pays to a mutual fund at the time of acquiring or redeeming the shares of the mutual fund.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the commission is charged when the investor buys the shares, it is identified as a front-end load. On the other hand if the commission is charged when the investors redeems his shares, it is known as a back-finish load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specific funds apply back-finish loads only if the shares are redeemed within a specific time period right after being purchased.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The argument for applying loads on mutual fund transactions is that these loads will discourage investors from trading regularly in mutual funds. If the investors swiftly move in and out of mutual funds, the funds have to preserve a higher money position to meet these redemptions, which in turn decreases the returns of the funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also frequent trading implies the bills of the mutual funds go up. [http://http:;//www.prestonhire.com.au/construction-props learn about construction props manufactureres]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are different arguments against load funds:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The charges that the mutual funds gather as loads are passed on to the fund brokers. The loads do not offer any incentive for the fund manager for far better performance of the funds. In other words, a load fund has no reason why its managers must execute better than these of no-load funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-In the last couple of decades, no distinction has been seen in the returns of load and no-load funds (if the loads are not regarded as.) When the loads are regarded as, the investors of load funds have really gained much less than the investors of no-load funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-When a sales person knows that he is going to get a commission from a load fund, he tends to push the load fund a lot more - even when the load funds are performing poorly as compared to no-load funds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Loads are understated by mutual funds. If an investor invests $1000 in a fund with five% front-finish load, the actual investment is only $950. As a result his actual load is $50 in $950 investment - a 5.26% load.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If an investor is already invested in a load fund, it doesnt make sense to exit now. The load has currently been paid for. The hold or sell selection must now only be based on what the investor thinks about the future overall performance of the fund. In a handful of funds, the exit load depends on the period for which the fund was held. Verify the details of the fund prospectus for much more details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most circumstances it is greater to avoid load funds however, investors ought to hold one particular factor in thoughts. Often load funds can be a far better selection than no-load funds. For example, an investor has a choice of two classes in a fund - class A and class B. Class A has three% front-end load and Class B has no load. The investor nevertheless misses the fine print, which states that Class B has 1% 12b-1 annual costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the fund will make ten% gains each and every year, its return in Class A (beginning with actual amount invested $970) will be&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
($970) X (1.10) X (1.ten) X (1.ten) X (1.10) X (1.10) = $1562&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Class B, the returns will be&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
($1000) X (1.10) X (.99) X (1.10) X (.99) X (1.10) X (.99) X (1.10) X (.99) X (1.10) X (.99) = $1532.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence the above instance is an exception, where in the extended run, the load fund will carry out far better than the no-load fund (with 12b-1 charges).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The truth is that a no-load fund cannot be regarded as a correct no-load fund, if it charges fees from it is investors in the type of 12b-1 and other costs.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Manor</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>