“Bollywood and smoking”的版本间的差异

来自女性百科
跳转至： 导航、 搜索
（新页面: On World No-tobacco Day by getting the very first country to exclude all smoking scenes in TELEVISION and films asia makes the report this past year. But because its story, the unfolding ...）
 
 
（未显示另一用户的1个中间版本）
第1行： 第1行：
−
On World No-tobacco Day by getting the very first country to exclude all smoking scenes in TELEVISION and films asia makes the report this past year. But because its story, the unfolding drama surrounding this new law is something like watching a film itself.Bollywood, probably the most respected film company on earth, features a long history of representing villains and heroes with cigarettes or hand-rolled "bidis" dangling from their lips. There's no denying the fact that on-screen smoking has a major impact on Indian youth and that a ban might protect the lives of millions of children who might be addicted to smoking under the influence of films. A 2003 World Health Organization survey estimated that India houses around 250 million tobacco users and that significantly more than 800,000 Indians die every year from smoking-related illnesses.The disagreements between your Health Ministry (which issued the ban) and Information & Broadcasting Ministry (which is entrusted to apply the ban) could defeat Saas-Bahu dramas. In addition, there is additional tart in the shape of the frustration and strong condemnation from the film industry with a great measure of statements from many involved, and court scenes, with filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt completing a PIL. Eventually today, the issue rests with the PMO to discover a suitable conclusion.Bollywood have firmly protested the Centre's decision to ban smoking moments in movies and on tv. Based on some of the makers, this is actually the film range, an entertainment company and they are not doing anything purposely. "We are simply playing a, painting a character [http://whitesmokereview.com/reviews/the-mistic-electronic-cigarette/ smokeless cigarettes in stores]. Suppose tomorrow, I do want to again make the movie "Devdas", he has to truly have the products. Tomorrow the minister may say you don't show him drinking; then how is it feasible? At least, they should have a talk with the picture industry," mentioned one producer.Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt recorded a in court seeking to quash the notification terming it as violation of the best to liberty of appearance and speech. Manager Shyam Benegal said the transfer would hinder creative expression. He feels the ban does not make this act and sense is convenient to build up a character.On another hand, some relate smoking ban with censorship. Actor director Amol Palekar feels that the current government ban on smoking on monitor amounts to censorship. "There are satisfactory regulations which govern marketing of other and cigarette tobacco products and services. But putting an overall total ban on showing smoking on the screen sums to censorship," he said in a special interview to The Afternoon After. "I have been opposed to censorship of any sort in film, theater or any other type of art. Censorship is not reasonable for art it self. It prevents free expression, which is vital for art."Stating that the ground on which the ban has been required is justified, Palekar states, however, that an overall total ban isn't the clear answer or way to control smoking. "The health conditions could be real. But if that is the case, there are many factors, which we must notice minutely. Going by the same standards, we will have to ban demonstrating drinking as well. Since, drinking is more harmful to health and it's a cultural evil", he says.The other part of concern is the enormous store of tv programs and previous films in most regional languages in which anti-smoking warnings must be introduced. The industry feels that clearing such an enormous backlog is almost impossible.But the greater emotion is that the bar goes against innovative certificate, especially given that smoking displays on Indian screen have substantially reduced in the existing politically right age.The Indian film industry is reported to be the largest in the world and provides over 900 films annually. These videos touch the lives of over 250 million people in India and produce demi-gods out of stars.In trying to become more like these celebrities, they copy the style of the onscreen figures and that always contains smoking and drinking to express a "cool" picture. The hottest screen minute of Rajnikanth tossing it into his mouth and flipping his cigarette has been replicated by many a teen.Meanwhile, the deadline of implementation of the ban was extended twice. Both the ministries have so far didn't achieve the agreement, and the PIL continues in the court. The Health Ministry has contacted the Prime Minister's office to intervene and resolve the matter.According to sources, this issue has become very painful and sensitive, as the Health Ministry has taken it down as a status issue. On the other hand, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry - despite finding it hard to implement the ban - can not strike it down completely.While the Health Ministry has been supporting a whole ban on smoking in movies and tv, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry has been searching for methods to implement the ban in a milder form with numerous exemptions.A little helping hand from government was had a need to solve the issue. They ought to did something tangible by reaching a consensus between all the divisions and film industry, and studying the feasibility of its implementation, before prematurely issuing directives on the same.The fact remains that production or selling of tobacco products isn't barred, and these are freely offered at any nook and corner of the nation. It, for that reason, nullifies the discussion that smoking ban on films and TV could reduce smoking. Also, if the youth could possibly get inspired by films and their characters, think about excluding killings, rapes, robberies, infidelity, obscenity, alcoholism, event teasing from films also?
+
On World No-tobacco Day by becoming the very first place to prohibit all smoking scenes in TV and movies India makes the record a year ago. But because its announcement, the unfolding crisis surrounding this new law is something like seeing a film itself.Bollywood, probably the most productive film company on earth, has a long history of portraying villains and heroes with cigarettes or hand-rolled "bidis" hanging from their lips. There's no denying the fact that on-screen smoking features a substantial affect Indian youth and that a ban would protect the lives of millions of children who might be addicted to smoking underneath the influence of films. A 2003 World Health Organization report estimated that India hosts around 250 million tobacco users and that more than 800,000 Indians die every year from smoking-related illnesses.The disagreements between your Health Ministry (which issued the ban) and Information & Broadcasting Ministry (which is entrusted to apply the ban) can beat Saas-Bahu dramas. Furthermore, there's additional spice in the proper execution of the rage and strong condemnation from the film industry with a great measure of claims from many concerned, and court scenes, with filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filing a PIL. Eventually today, the issue rests with the PMO to locate a acceptable conclusion.Bollywood have firmly protested the Centre's decision to prohibit smoking moments in films and on television. Based on some of the producers, this is actually the picture range, an amusement business and they're not doing something deliberately. "We are just enjoying a, painting a character. Guess tomorrow, I want to again make the movie "Devdas", he's to really have the products. Tomorrow the minister may say that you do not show him drinking; then how is it feasible? the picture industry," mentioned one producer.Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filed a in courtroom seeking to quash the notice terming it as breach of the proper to liberty of speech and appearance at the least, they will have a talk. Director Shyam Benegal said the move would hinder artistic expression. He thinks the ban doesn't make sense and this act is helpful to develop a character.On the other hand, some associate smoking ban with censorship. Actor director Amol Palekar feels that the recent government ban on smoking on monitor amounts to censorship. "There are ample regulations which govern advertising of other and cigarette tobacco services and products. But adding a total ban on demonstrating smoking on the screen sums to censorship," he explained in an exclusive interview to The Day After. "I will always be in opposition to censorship of any kind in picture, cinema or any other form of art. Censorship is not reasonable for art it self. It blocks free expression, which is critical for art."Stating that the bottom on which the ban has been added is validated, Palekar claims, however, that a complete ban is not the answer or way to control smoking. "The health concerns might be legitimate. But when that is the case, there are many things, which we have to notice minutely. Going by the same criteria, we will have to prohibit demonstrating drinking as well. Since, drinking is more injurious to health and it's a social evil", he says.The other part of concern is the massive archive of previous films and television programmes in most regional languages in which anti-smoking warnings will have to be put. The industry feels that cleaning such a big backlog 's almost impossible.But the larger sentiment is that the bar goes against creative permit, particularly given that smoking scenes on Indian monitor have considerably reduced in the current politically right age.The Indian film industry is reported to be the greatest in the world and delivers over 900 shows a year. These movies touch the lives of around 250 million people in India and build demi-gods out of stars.In trying to be more like these celebrities, they duplicate the type of the onscreen figures and that often includes smoking and drinking to represent a "cool" image. The most popular screen second of Rajnikanth throwing it into his mouth and turning his cigarette has been replicated by many a teen.Meanwhile, the deadline of implementation of the bar was extended twice. Both the ministries have up to now didn't achieve the opinion, and the PIL remains in the court. The Health Ministry has contacted the Prime Minister's office to intervene and solve the matter.According to options, this issue has become very sensitive, as the Health Ministry has taken it down as a prestige issue. On the other hand, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry - despite finding it hard to implement the ban - can't strike it down completely.While the Health Ministry has been supporting a whole ban on smoking in films and television, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry has been searching for methods to implement the ban in a milder form with numerous exemptions.A bit of helping hand from government was had a need to solve the issue. They should have done some thing real by achieving an agreement between all the sectors and movie industry, and considering the feasibility of its implementation, before prematurely issuing directives on the same [http://whitesmokereview.com/reviews/blu-cigs-review/ v2 cigarette coupon codes].The fact remains that manufacturing or selling of tobacco products isn't prohibited, and these are freely available at any nook and corner of the nation. It, thus, nullifies the argument that smoking ban on TV and films may decrease smoking. Also, if the youth can get influenced by films and their figures, how about banning murders, rapes, robberies, adultery, obscenity, alcoholism, eve proposition from films also?

2013年4月26日 (五) 13:17的最新版本

On World No-tobacco Day by becoming the very first place to prohibit all smoking scenes in TV and movies India makes the record a year ago. But because its announcement, the unfolding crisis surrounding this new law is something like seeing a film itself.Bollywood, probably the most productive film company on earth, has a long history of portraying villains and heroes with cigarettes or hand-rolled "bidis" hanging from their lips. There's no denying the fact that on-screen smoking features a substantial affect Indian youth and that a ban would protect the lives of millions of children who might be addicted to smoking underneath the influence of films. A 2003 World Health Organization report estimated that India hosts around 250 million tobacco users and that more than 800,000 Indians die every year from smoking-related illnesses.The disagreements between your Health Ministry (which issued the ban) and Information & Broadcasting Ministry (which is entrusted to apply the ban) can beat Saas-Bahu dramas. Furthermore, there's additional spice in the proper execution of the rage and strong condemnation from the film industry with a great measure of claims from many concerned, and court scenes, with filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filing a PIL. Eventually today, the issue rests with the PMO to locate a acceptable conclusion.Bollywood have firmly protested the Centre's decision to prohibit smoking moments in films and on television. Based on some of the producers, this is actually the picture range, an amusement business and they're not doing something deliberately. "We are just enjoying a, painting a character. Guess tomorrow, I want to again make the movie "Devdas", he's to really have the products. Tomorrow the minister may say that you do not show him drinking; then how is it feasible? the picture industry," mentioned one producer.Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filed a in courtroom seeking to quash the notice terming it as breach of the proper to liberty of speech and appearance at the least, they will have a talk. Director Shyam Benegal said the move would hinder artistic expression. He thinks the ban doesn't make sense and this act is helpful to develop a character.On the other hand, some associate smoking ban with censorship. Actor director Amol Palekar feels that the recent government ban on smoking on monitor amounts to censorship. "There are ample regulations which govern advertising of other and cigarette tobacco services and products. But adding a total ban on demonstrating smoking on the screen sums to censorship," he explained in an exclusive interview to The Day After. "I will always be in opposition to censorship of any kind in picture, cinema or any other form of art. Censorship is not reasonable for art it self. It blocks free expression, which is critical for art."Stating that the bottom on which the ban has been added is validated, Palekar claims, however, that a complete ban is not the answer or way to control smoking. "The health concerns might be legitimate. But when that is the case, there are many things, which we have to notice minutely. Going by the same criteria, we will have to prohibit demonstrating drinking as well. Since, drinking is more injurious to health and it's a social evil", he says.The other part of concern is the massive archive of previous films and television programmes in most regional languages in which anti-smoking warnings will have to be put. The industry feels that cleaning such a big backlog 's almost impossible.But the larger sentiment is that the bar goes against creative permit, particularly given that smoking scenes on Indian monitor have considerably reduced in the current politically right age.The Indian film industry is reported to be the greatest in the world and delivers over 900 shows a year. These movies touch the lives of around 250 million people in India and build demi-gods out of stars.In trying to be more like these celebrities, they duplicate the type of the onscreen figures and that often includes smoking and drinking to represent a "cool" image. The most popular screen second of Rajnikanth throwing it into his mouth and turning his cigarette has been replicated by many a teen.Meanwhile, the deadline of implementation of the bar was extended twice. Both the ministries have up to now didn't achieve the opinion, and the PIL remains in the court. The Health Ministry has contacted the Prime Minister's office to intervene and solve the matter.According to options, this issue has become very sensitive, as the Health Ministry has taken it down as a prestige issue. On the other hand, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry - despite finding it hard to implement the ban - can't strike it down completely.While the Health Ministry has been supporting a whole ban on smoking in films and television, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry has been searching for methods to implement the ban in a milder form with numerous exemptions.A bit of helping hand from government was had a need to solve the issue. They should have done some thing real by achieving an agreement between all the sectors and movie industry, and considering the feasibility of its implementation, before prematurely issuing directives on the same v2 cigarette coupon codes.The fact remains that manufacturing or selling of tobacco products isn't prohibited, and these are freely available at any nook and corner of the nation. It, thus, nullifies the argument that smoking ban on TV and films may decrease smoking. Also, if the youth can get influenced by films and their figures, how about banning murders, rapes, robberies, adultery, obscenity, alcoholism, eve proposition from films also?

取自“https://www.8beauty.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bollywood_and_smoking&oldid=52214”