“Bollywood and smoking”的版本间的差异

来自女性百科
跳转至： 导航、 搜索
 
第1行： 第1行：
−
India makes the record this past year on World No-tobacco Day by getting the initial state to exclude all smoking moments in TELEVISION and films. But since its statement, the unfolding drama surrounding this new law is something such as watching a movie itself.Bollywood, the most prolific film maker on the planet, features a long history of representing heroes and villains with cigarettes or hand-rolled "bidis" hanging from their lips. There is no denying the fact that on-screen smoking has a important affect Indian youth and that a ban could protect the lives of thousands of children who could be addicted to smoking beneath the influence of films. A 2003 World Health Organization report estimated that India is home to about 250 million tobacco users and that more than 800,000 Indians die every year from smoking-related illnesses.The arguments between your Health Ministry (which issued the ban) and Information & Broadcasting Ministry (which is entrusted to implement the ban) may beat Saas-Bahu dramas. Additionally, there's added spice in the proper execution of the strong condemnation and anger from the movie industry with a great measure of phrases from many concerned, and courtroom scenes, with filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt completing a PIL. Eventually today, the issue rests with the PMO to find a acceptable conclusion.Bollywood have firmly protested the Centre's decision to ban smoking scenes in films and on tv. Based on some of the suppliers, here is the picture line, an entertainment business and they're not doing something specially. "We are simply enjoying a, painting a character. Guess tomorrow, I do want to again make the film "Devdas", he's to have the products [http://smokelesscigarettesreviews.org/ best Electronic Cigarette]. Tomorrow the minister can say you do not present him drinking; then how is it possible? At least, they will have a consult with the video industry," explained one producer.Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filed a in courtroom seeking to quash the notification terming it as violation of the best to liberty of speech and expression. Manager Shyam Benegal said the transfer could hinder artistic expression. He thinks the ban doesn't make this act and sense is practical to build up a character.On another hand, some associate smoking ban with censorship. Actor manager Amol Palekar feels that the new government ban on smoking on monitor amounts to censorship. "There are ample rules which govern promotion of other and cigarette tobacco services and products. But putting a complete ban on showing smoking on the screen sums to censorship," he said in an exclusive interview to The Day After. "I have been opposed to censorship of any kind in movie, cinema or any other form of art. Censorship isn't reasonable for art itself. It blocks free expression, which is essential for art."Stating that the bottom on which the ban has been charged is validated, Palekar says, however, that a complete ban isn't the answer or method to curb smoking. "The health conditions could be real. But when that is the case, there are many factors, which we need to discover minutely. Going by the exact same criteria, we will need certainly to suspend showing drinking as well. Since, drinking is more injurious to health and it is a cultural evil", he says.The different area of concern is the enormous repository of old films and tv programmes in all regional languages by which anti-smoking warnings will have to be placed. The industry feels that clearing such an enormous backlog is nearly impossible.But the greater sentiment is that the bar goes against innovative certificate, especially given that smoking views on Indian monitor have drastically decreased in the present politically appropriate age.The Indian film industry is considered the greatest in the world and produces over 900 shows annually. These movies touch the lives of over 250 million people in India and create demi-gods out of stars.In trying to be much more like these stars, they copy the type of the onscreen characters and that often contains smoking and drinking to show a "cool" image. The most widely used screen second of Rajnikanth throwing it into his mouth and tossing his cigarette has been copied by many a teen.Meanwhile, the timeline of implementation of the ban was extended twice. Both the ministries have to date did not reach the agreement, and the PIL is still there in the court. The Health Ministry has approached the Prime Minister's office to intervene and solve the matter.According to sources, this issue has become very painful and sensitive, as the Health Ministry has taken it down as a status issue. On the other hand, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry - despite finding it hard to implement the ban - can't hit it down completely.While the Health Ministry has been supporting a complete ban on smoking in movies and tv, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry has been searching for methods to implement the ban in a milder form with various exemptions.A little bit of helping hand from government was needed seriously to resolve the matter. They should have done something tangible by reaching an agreement between all the sections and film industry, and studying the feasibility of its implementation, before prematurely issuing directives on the same.The fact remains that manufacturing or marketing of tobacco products is not barred, and these are freely available at any nook and corner of the country. It, consequently, nullifies the argument that smoking ban on movies and TELEVISION could decrease smoking. Also, if the youth could possibly get influenced by films and their heroes, how about banning murders, rapes, robberies, infidelity, obscenity, alcoholism, eve teasing from films too?
+
On World No-tobacco Day by becoming the very first place to prohibit all smoking scenes in TV and movies India makes the record a year ago. But because its announcement, the unfolding crisis surrounding this new law is something like seeing a film itself.Bollywood, probably the most productive film company on earth, has a long history of portraying villains and heroes with cigarettes or hand-rolled "bidis" hanging from their lips. There's no denying the fact that on-screen smoking features a substantial affect Indian youth and that a ban would protect the lives of millions of children who might be addicted to smoking underneath the influence of films. A 2003 World Health Organization report estimated that India hosts around 250 million tobacco users and that more than 800,000 Indians die every year from smoking-related illnesses.The disagreements between your Health Ministry (which issued the ban) and Information & Broadcasting Ministry (which is entrusted to apply the ban) can beat Saas-Bahu dramas. Furthermore, there's additional spice in the proper execution of the rage and strong condemnation from the film industry with a great measure of claims from many concerned, and court scenes, with filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filing a PIL. Eventually today, the issue rests with the PMO to locate a acceptable conclusion.Bollywood have firmly protested the Centre's decision to prohibit smoking moments in films and on television. Based on some of the producers, this is actually the picture range, an amusement business and they're not doing something deliberately. "We are just enjoying a, painting a character. Guess tomorrow, I want to again make the movie "Devdas", he's to really have the products. Tomorrow the minister may say that you do not show him drinking; then how is it feasible? the picture industry," mentioned one producer.Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filed a in courtroom seeking to quash the notice terming it as breach of the proper to liberty of speech and appearance at the least, they will have a talk. Director Shyam Benegal said the move would hinder artistic expression. He thinks the ban doesn't make sense and this act is helpful to develop a character.On the other hand, some associate smoking ban with censorship. Actor director Amol Palekar feels that the recent government ban on smoking on monitor amounts to censorship. "There are ample regulations which govern advertising of other and cigarette tobacco services and products. But adding a total ban on demonstrating smoking on the screen sums to censorship," he explained in an exclusive interview to The Day After. "I will always be in opposition to censorship of any kind in picture, cinema or any other form of art. Censorship is not reasonable for art it self. It blocks free expression, which is critical for art."Stating that the bottom on which the ban has been added is validated, Palekar claims, however, that a complete ban is not the answer or way to control smoking. "The health concerns might be legitimate. But when that is the case, there are many things, which we have to notice minutely. Going by the same criteria, we will have to prohibit demonstrating drinking as well. Since, drinking is more injurious to health and it's a social evil", he says.The other part of concern is the massive archive of previous films and television programmes in most regional languages in which anti-smoking warnings will have to be put. The industry feels that cleaning such a big backlog 's almost impossible.But the larger sentiment is that the bar goes against creative permit, particularly given that smoking scenes on Indian monitor have considerably reduced in the current politically right age.The Indian film industry is reported to be the greatest in the world and delivers over 900 shows a year. These movies touch the lives of around 250 million people in India and build demi-gods out of stars.In trying to be more like these celebrities, they duplicate the type of the onscreen figures and that often includes smoking and drinking to represent a "cool" image. The most popular screen second of Rajnikanth throwing it into his mouth and turning his cigarette has been replicated by many a teen.Meanwhile, the deadline of implementation of the bar was extended twice. Both the ministries have up to now didn't achieve the opinion, and the PIL remains in the court. The Health Ministry has contacted the Prime Minister's office to intervene and solve the matter.According to options, this issue has become very sensitive, as the Health Ministry has taken it down as a prestige issue. On the other hand, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry - despite finding it hard to implement the ban - can't strike it down completely.While the Health Ministry has been supporting a whole ban on smoking in films and television, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry has been searching for methods to implement the ban in a milder form with numerous exemptions.A bit of helping hand from government was had a need to solve the issue. They should have done some thing real by achieving an agreement between all the sectors and movie industry, and considering the feasibility of its implementation, before prematurely issuing directives on the same [http://whitesmokereview.com/reviews/blu-cigs-review/ v2 cigarette coupon codes].The fact remains that manufacturing or selling of tobacco products isn't prohibited, and these are freely available at any nook and corner of the nation. It, thus, nullifies the argument that smoking ban on TV and films may decrease smoking. Also, if the youth can get influenced by films and their figures, how about banning murders, rapes, robberies, adultery, obscenity, alcoholism, eve proposition from films also?

2013年4月26日 (五) 13:17的最新版本

On World No-tobacco Day by becoming the very first place to prohibit all smoking scenes in TV and movies India makes the record a year ago. But because its announcement, the unfolding crisis surrounding this new law is something like seeing a film itself.Bollywood, probably the most productive film company on earth, has a long history of portraying villains and heroes with cigarettes or hand-rolled "bidis" hanging from their lips. There's no denying the fact that on-screen smoking features a substantial affect Indian youth and that a ban would protect the lives of millions of children who might be addicted to smoking underneath the influence of films. A 2003 World Health Organization report estimated that India hosts around 250 million tobacco users and that more than 800,000 Indians die every year from smoking-related illnesses.The disagreements between your Health Ministry (which issued the ban) and Information & Broadcasting Ministry (which is entrusted to apply the ban) can beat Saas-Bahu dramas. Furthermore, there's additional spice in the proper execution of the rage and strong condemnation from the film industry with a great measure of claims from many concerned, and court scenes, with filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filing a PIL. Eventually today, the issue rests with the PMO to locate a acceptable conclusion.Bollywood have firmly protested the Centre's decision to prohibit smoking moments in films and on television. Based on some of the producers, this is actually the picture range, an amusement business and they're not doing something deliberately. "We are just enjoying a, painting a character. Guess tomorrow, I want to again make the movie "Devdas", he's to really have the products. Tomorrow the minister may say that you do not show him drinking; then how is it feasible? the picture industry," mentioned one producer.Filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt filed a in courtroom seeking to quash the notice terming it as breach of the proper to liberty of speech and appearance at the least, they will have a talk. Director Shyam Benegal said the move would hinder artistic expression. He thinks the ban doesn't make sense and this act is helpful to develop a character.On the other hand, some associate smoking ban with censorship. Actor director Amol Palekar feels that the recent government ban on smoking on monitor amounts to censorship. "There are ample regulations which govern advertising of other and cigarette tobacco services and products. But adding a total ban on demonstrating smoking on the screen sums to censorship," he explained in an exclusive interview to The Day After. "I will always be in opposition to censorship of any kind in picture, cinema or any other form of art. Censorship is not reasonable for art it self. It blocks free expression, which is critical for art."Stating that the bottom on which the ban has been added is validated, Palekar claims, however, that a complete ban is not the answer or way to control smoking. "The health concerns might be legitimate. But when that is the case, there are many things, which we have to notice minutely. Going by the same criteria, we will have to prohibit demonstrating drinking as well. Since, drinking is more injurious to health and it's a social evil", he says.The other part of concern is the massive archive of previous films and television programmes in most regional languages in which anti-smoking warnings will have to be put. The industry feels that cleaning such a big backlog 's almost impossible.But the larger sentiment is that the bar goes against creative permit, particularly given that smoking scenes on Indian monitor have considerably reduced in the current politically right age.The Indian film industry is reported to be the greatest in the world and delivers over 900 shows a year. These movies touch the lives of around 250 million people in India and build demi-gods out of stars.In trying to be more like these celebrities, they duplicate the type of the onscreen figures and that often includes smoking and drinking to represent a "cool" image. The most popular screen second of Rajnikanth throwing it into his mouth and turning his cigarette has been replicated by many a teen.Meanwhile, the deadline of implementation of the bar was extended twice. Both the ministries have up to now didn't achieve the opinion, and the PIL remains in the court. The Health Ministry has contacted the Prime Minister's office to intervene and solve the matter.According to options, this issue has become very sensitive, as the Health Ministry has taken it down as a prestige issue. On the other hand, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry - despite finding it hard to implement the ban - can't strike it down completely.While the Health Ministry has been supporting a whole ban on smoking in films and television, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry has been searching for methods to implement the ban in a milder form with numerous exemptions.A bit of helping hand from government was had a need to solve the issue. They should have done some thing real by achieving an agreement between all the sectors and movie industry, and considering the feasibility of its implementation, before prematurely issuing directives on the same v2 cigarette coupon codes.The fact remains that manufacturing or selling of tobacco products isn't prohibited, and these are freely available at any nook and corner of the nation. It, thus, nullifies the argument that smoking ban on TV and films may decrease smoking. Also, if the youth can get influenced by films and their figures, how about banning murders, rapes, robberies, adultery, obscenity, alcoholism, eve proposition from films also?

取自“https://www.8beauty.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bollywood_and_smoking&oldid=52214”