Coomer

Nuclear power plants currently provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity, yet how much of the sides current and future environmental dilemmas does Nuclear Power donate to? Nuclear power has both strong enemies and friends but does the bottom line come down to prices? The December 2005 World Nuclear Association report The Newest Economics of Nuclear Power claims that Nuclear energy is cost competitive with other designs of electricity generation, except where there's direct access to low-cost fossil fuels. When every week price increases are announced from all the gas and electricity suppliers in britain the requirement for low priced energy can't be fought. The Ukraine recently had their fuel supply ended by Russia, how long could it be before this happens to great BRITAIN? Do when it comes to the technology of energy we not need to be self-sufficient? Could green energy perhaps not commence to have a larger part in this source?

The report goes on to express that fuel costs for nuclear plants are a small amount of total generating costs, though capital costs are greater than those for coal-fired plants. At the NIA 2006 introduction of the Commissions position paper on the function of nuclear it proved that nuclear is just a low carbon technology with an outstanding safety record in the UK and Nuclear might produce large amounts of electricity, add to stabilising CO2 emissions and enhance the range of the UKs energy source. While we have an extraordinary record of safety in britain, Chernobyl has shown that the nuclear incident tens and thousands of miles away may influence the UK for many years to come. The Tsunami also caused issues at Nuclear Power plants around Asia as the plants are designed near the sea due to the wide range of water had a need to cool the rectors. compare solar power systems