The Superhyperbolic (Superultramodern) Uncertainty

Theorem: Such a thing could be possible.1. That which could otherwise be thought to be totally (or 100%) definitely impossible currently could be possible as the intellectual capabilities of the believer may be limited. That is, the proposition/s, as an example, that are otherwise thought to be positively definitely correct could possibly be false.Controversy:1. Hyperbolic Cartesian question compared to. Superhyperbolic doubtThe Cartesian doubt, also referred to as the hyperbolic doubt, could be the doubt raised by Rene Descartes on anything except their own existence as he is a thinking, particularly questioning, substance. Ergo, the Cartesian doubt is the concept that 'anything might be possible, except the inability of one's own existence as you is really a thinking, particularly questioning, element.' The Cartesian doubt thus contradicts the superhyperbolic doubt.Let us for a moment concur with the Cartesian inference that 'I believe (especially doubt) for that reason I'm .' But still it could be that it is a wrong way of thinking. I naturally believe that as there is any doubt there's to be a person who worries. But it might be a wrong inference. My language, as an example, often identifies 'I' since I can not feel otherwise. But I could well think that I might be wrong. The essential thought involved in the justification of the theorem of the superhyperbolic doubt appears to become more fundamental than the thought generally involved in the Cartesian doubt.The Cartesian doubt is also known as 'Universal Doubt.' However, Cartesian skepticism isn't actually common since it is not applicable to itself or one's own lifetime. The superhyperbolic doubt is universal as it is perhaps appropriate to itself or one's own existence.2. Particular general doubt versus. Unclear universal doubt'Certain universal uncertainty' would be the principle that 'anything is possible this is the best food.' Contrary to it, the theory of superhyperbolic doubt that 'such a thing may be possible' could be 'unclear common doubt.' Today, fairly obviously, as a universal question is all-inclusive, it pertains to itself (or is self-referential), and therefore must be uncertain.Philosophical Implications of the Superhyperbolic Doubt:1. All principles as 99.99...% certainly trueAll of the propositions which otherwise appear to be 100% (or totally) certainly true should now be likely to be 99.99...% certainly true. Quite simply, it must be thought that it's 0.00...1% likely that those axiomatic propositions are false. An example of such propositions could be 'if p means q, and p is true, then q is true.' That 0.00...1% slightest border in the belief system ought to be reserved/retained for the welfare of the superhyperbolic doubt.2. No belief in a proofImplication 1 suggests that there ought to be no belief in a mathematical) proof. Anything could actually have been proved, but it'd be illogical for one to feel that it's been proved. (Here the term 'evidence' means particular, absolute, or specific resolution of a problem. )3. All mathematics as philosophyImplication 2 implies that all mathematics is hypothetical and therefore philosophical.